Updted trading and price tables (softcore)

AI just fails at making lists like this because the AI does not understand the game. Neither does it understand trading and how to valie and weigh it.

1. Failure: The human craving for perfection. AI completely lacks the knowledge that maximum rolls are usually much higher priced than 95% perfect.
For example: same price for CtA 5/6 BO and Mara's 28-30.

2. Some data seem to be outdated. The times when a bad 12/12 Pala torch got you an Ohm on nl sc are long gone, way too many good torches are lying around. Most Pandemonium runners are more than willing to sell bad torches for cheap, even Pala torches.

3. Some data seems to be completely made up. A token has never been as low as a Pul. For most of the time, it was a little bit more than Ist. Since RotW it has been a bit more than Um. But Pul? Never.

There are probably many more.

I appreciate your effort, but AI and human experience must come together to make good lists like this.
If one of them or both are saying "I don't know what I'm doing", the result will have a slim chance of becoming accidentally useful.

vued wrote: 3 hours ago

AardvarksAdvance wrote: 3 hours ago

Disagree with the valuations - there are a number that are just out. Some are vastly undervalued and some are so overvalued.

Tal Rasha Set Lo to Ber? One might struggle to sell a set for more than a few Ist.. probably even more so for some of the less useful sets…

At start of ladder, Tal Armor+Amu (or complete set, rest is not worth much) go for Ber, because the set provides immense mf. It's value drops quickly though. On non ladder, you can be happy to get an Ist.

I don't disagree - point made as the Lo- Ber value was under the NL column... NL where you can't walk down the lobby without being offered 15 sets of Tal armors...