28
replies
1671 views
Description
My rig is i7 4790 with 1660 super gt.
32gb ram.
The game runs good.
Also I’m 4k
So not max settings.
Who here runs on it on maximum with 4k?
What rig?
32gb ram.
The game runs good.
Also I’m 4k
So not max settings.
Who here runs on it on maximum with 4k?
What rig?
Can be used to make Runewords:
My rig is i7 4790 with 1660 super gt.
32gb ram.
The game runs good.
Also I’m 4k
So not max settings.
Who here runs on it on maximum with 4k?
What rig?
32gb ram.
The game runs good.
Also I’m 4k
So not max settings.
Who here runs on it on maximum with 4k?
What rig?
goodluck, and may the RNG god be with you.
What is rig ?
I have almost the same 10 years old setup with 16Gb ram but changed the video card for a RTX 2060.
Runs smooth.
I have almost the same 10 years old setup with 16Gb ram but changed the video card for a RTX 2060.
Runs smooth.
My timezone is CET/UTC+1.
OP
But on maximum?
Rig. Is like oil rig. Only in computers
As in your machine. Just another name
Rig. Is like oil rig. Only in computers
As in your machine. Just another name
goodluck, and may the RNG god be with you.
I don't a 4k monitor, so 1080p with ultra settings.
My timezone is CET/UTC+1.
Ultra settings on 1080p vs Ultra setting on 4K is like when you wipe down the mobs on the Normal and Nightmare (1080p) and hit a wall on Hell (4K) at the first Zombie on Blood Moor

As about performance I play on 2K (2560 x 1440) and with all maxed I have 143 FPS. But the power consumption of the graphic card is pretty high, 250 W and is staying at 90% load. I play with framerate cap at 60 FPS and the power goes down at 150 W and video card loading at 40%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
32 GB RAM
SSD Sata (where the game is installed) and SSD Nvme Windows
Windows 11
My Holy Grail - holygrailtracker.php?user_id=106606
4k LG monitor, 60fps ultra settings
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD Radeon RX 6900XT
32Gb DDR3 3200
1Tb NVME SSD
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD Radeon RX 6900XT
32Gb DDR3 3200
1Tb NVME SSD
Full HD (I don't like running anything above that), 240Hz monitor, fps doesn't drop below 130 on max settings with:
16GB of RAM DDR4 @ 1200MHz
Intel Core i5 7500 @ 3.40GHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 4GB
Just a regular ass HDD WD Black
Win 10 ftw [say no to Win 11]!
16GB of RAM DDR4 @ 1200MHz
Intel Core i5 7500 @ 3.40GHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 4GB
Just a regular ass HDD WD Black
Win 10 ftw [say no to Win 11]!

Someone much smarter than me already said once: "The real value of something doesn't reflect in a number of how much a seller can ask for it, but on how much a buyer is willing to pay."
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
96 GB DDR5-6000 RAM
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
1 TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe system SSD
2 TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe game SSD
I play the game at 3840x1600 on my 38" ultrawide monitor. I can play it on my secondary screen which is a 55" 4K TV, but that's positioned to be more comfortable to play with a wireless gamepad rather than a mouse and keyboard. However, I just did run it on my TV now and got 75-125 FPS depending on area with all quality settings maxed and TAA enabled.
I usually don't play with all settings maxed because I'm not paying attention to the difference in the three settings that can be changed from very high to ultra. I also enable a framerate cap of 120 FPS because the monitor is 144 Hz (that I also run at 120 Hz to match the TV and minimize unusual behavior when moving apps between screens).
96 GB DDR5-6000 RAM
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
1 TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe system SSD
2 TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe game SSD
I play the game at 3840x1600 on my 38" ultrawide monitor. I can play it on my secondary screen which is a 55" 4K TV, but that's positioned to be more comfortable to play with a wireless gamepad rather than a mouse and keyboard. However, I just did run it on my TV now and got 75-125 FPS depending on area with all quality settings maxed and TAA enabled.
I usually don't play with all settings maxed because I'm not paying attention to the difference in the three settings that can be changed from very high to ultra. I also enable a framerate cap of 120 FPS because the monitor is 144 Hz (that I also run at 120 Hz to match the TV and minimize unusual behavior when moving apps between screens).

PC | Softcore Non-Ladder | US Eastern Time (UTC-4)
Expansion Ladder Season 1 Level 99 (#115 Amazon, #584 Overall)

EPOCH FAIL
I know, 4k is 4 x 1080p.Florian_G wrote: 2 months agoUltra settings on 1080p vs Ultra setting on 4K is like when you wipe down the mobs on the Normal and Nightmare (1080p) and hit a wall on Hell (4K) at the first Zombie on Blood Moor![]()
But I don't plan to waste money in a 10 years old setup.
Anyway that second-handed RTX 2060 12Gb saved it for a low cost lol.
My timezone is CET/UTC+1.
Rtx 4080
16GB 5400 GDDR5
i7 16 cores with SSD
Game runs smoothly, loads fast but I must turn the game from Task Manager -> Details -> d2r.exe priority into real time. Otherwise I have weird fps drops (vsynced to 75 as my screen is only 75 hrtz at best and I play in 1080p) and this is the only "fix" ive found for it.
16GB 5400 GDDR5
i7 16 cores with SSD
Game runs smoothly, loads fast but I must turn the game from Task Manager -> Details -> d2r.exe priority into real time. Otherwise I have weird fps drops (vsynced to 75 as my screen is only 75 hrtz at best and I play in 1080p) and this is the only "fix" ive found for it.
8 year old mac mini FTW
OP
Lol for last response.
Thanks all for the comments.
If you guys run it on max setting of full 4k.
I guess 14000k and 5070 rtx can nail it.
I’m worried about that 4080 response though…
Thanks all for the comments.
If you guys run it on max setting of full 4k.
I guess 14000k and 5070 rtx can nail it.
I’m worried about that 4080 response though…
goodluck, and may the RNG god be with you.
Seems i'm the only one running with a 3050 gfx.
(with a 12600 i5)
(with a 12600 i5)
I am using RTX 2080 8gb. Gigabyte Aorus with my own OC using i7-10700k to 5.0 locked all cores. D2R is running on 4096 x 2304 12bpc. (that is True 4k DCI resolution using DLAA btw, not 4k ohhh its 4k. no no. its the actual 1 to 1 full render of D2R... and in HDR600 calibrated)
I have a very cheap 34-inch Sceptre E345B IPS W-Led Matte (however, rebranded with a different OSD / terrible functions and options from Australia)
https://www.displayspecifications.com/en/model/93182d10
I am using the HP X34 WQHD Advanced ICC HDR Colour profile by forcing the off-Brand monitor to think it's an HPX34. The display panel is (exactly) just a different shell; I then calibrated it.
I have overclocked and tightened the monitor timings on that cheap monitor to 4096 x 2304 active at 1:1 pixel ratio at 16:9 with 12 BPC HDR600 using CRU.
I run NvTrueHDR to force correct gamma values and tweaked multiple GPU settings with NvInspector.
I have unlocked Resolution and Ray Reconstruction to force DLAA @ 100% native resolution in Nvidia App.
This is the result in HDR (Jpeg- 2.5mb and Jxr - 40mb)
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/6em72ihj ... xmjcq&dl=0
You may need this to view the file after you download it.
https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9pgn3 ... n-GB&gl=AU
Just a reminder. It's not that you can say you paid to do it; it's that you did it yourself.
I have a very cheap 34-inch Sceptre E345B IPS W-Led Matte (however, rebranded with a different OSD / terrible functions and options from Australia)
https://www.displayspecifications.com/en/model/93182d10
I am using the HP X34 WQHD Advanced ICC HDR Colour profile by forcing the off-Brand monitor to think it's an HPX34. The display panel is (exactly) just a different shell; I then calibrated it.
I have overclocked and tightened the monitor timings on that cheap monitor to 4096 x 2304 active at 1:1 pixel ratio at 16:9 with 12 BPC HDR600 using CRU.
I run NvTrueHDR to force correct gamma values and tweaked multiple GPU settings with NvInspector.
I have unlocked Resolution and Ray Reconstruction to force DLAA @ 100% native resolution in Nvidia App.
This is the result in HDR (Jpeg- 2.5mb and Jxr - 40mb)
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/6em72ihj ... xmjcq&dl=0
You may need this to view the file after you download it.
https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9pgn3 ... n-GB&gl=AU
Just a reminder. It's not that you can say you paid to do it; it's that you did it yourself.
I am using this setup:
Ryzen 5700x3d
Radeon rx 7800xt
64gb ram
… I play on a 34“ curved widesxreen on 1440p-wide. Everything turned to max and everything rund buttery smooth.
Ryzen 5700x3d
Radeon rx 7800xt
64gb ram
… I play on a 34“ curved widesxreen on 1440p-wide. Everything turned to max and everything rund buttery smooth.
Like @Florian_G stated you really want to Cap the FPS in this title because it will just soak up the entire GPU capacity and this game originally was intended for 30FPS and worked fine. Unlike say, a first-person-shooter there's no point in going for 4K resolution at 300 FPS.
100% this. The underlying game-engine is still 25 FPS. You should be capping it at 65 to take the stress off the GPU utilization & temps. This then allows you to push max thresholds more seamlessly without unnecessary load. Another recommendation is throttling down your Vfx to high or lower if needed.ghostpos wrote: 1 month agoLike @Florian_G stated you really want to Cap the FPS in this title because it will just soak up the entire GPU capacity and this game originally was intended for 30FPS and worked fine. Unlike say, a first-person-shooter there's no point in going for 4K resolution at 300 FPS.
Everyone's rig & components are different and unique so there is no one-size fits all.
Better off using vsync FAST fixed settings locally over DLSS which is overkill and quite unnecessary for D2R. It many cases, performance is worse for many that attempt to implement it over vsync FAST.
Ah didn't know it was 25FPS originally, thanks for the correction! @Th3ory
All good! That comment was not intended to correct you - more so agreeing with you on the point of vsync fast + 65 FPS Cap. I've played both with it capped at 65 and uncapped and it plays the same plus it puts far less stress on the GPU both with temps + utilization.ghostpos wrote: 1 month agoAh didn't know it was 25FPS originally, thanks for the correction! @Th3ory
And that trade-off enables you to then push everything else to max settings if you choose.
Even if the underlying engine still calculates at 25FPS, the animations on top will be much smoother at high FPS (also cursor movement), so if someone has a high refresh rate display, he should absolutely use it.Th3ory wrote: 1 month agoAll good! That comment was not intended to correct you - more so agreeing with you on the point of vsync fast + 65 FPS Cap. I've played both with it capped at 65 and uncapped and it plays the same plus it puts far less stress on the GPU both with temps + utilization.ghostpos wrote: 1 month agoAh didn't know it was 25FPS originally, thanks for the correction! @Th3ory
And that trade-off enables you to then push everything else to max settings if you choose.
Similar pages
-
-
-
-
Performance Improvement
byGuest
-
-
Advertisment

Greetings stranger!
You don't appear to be logged in...No matches
rikus
153