12
replies
368 views
Description
That’s it. That’s the post
Can be used to make Runewords:
That’s it. That’s the post
I don't think so.
But one socket in belts would make sense (the Belt "buckle") and would allow to place an Ancient Jewel there when runewords take up hands, head and chest. I'm against power-creep but this would only be a minor buff for all characters that might be fun.
But one socket in belts would make sense (the Belt "buckle") and would allow to place an Ancient Jewel there when runewords take up hands, head and chest. I'm against power-creep but this would only be a minor buff for all characters that might be fun.
Fantastic idea. Make it happen lolmikelessar wrote: 12 hours agoI don't think so.
But one socket slot in belts would make sense (the Belt "buckle") and would allow to place an Ancient Jewel there when runewords take up hands, head and chest.
Ok, done. It's in the game now.Rhaegar86 wrote: 12 hours agoFantastic idea. Make it happen lolmikelessar wrote: 12 hours agoI don't think so.
But one socket slot in belts would make sense (the Belt "buckle") and would allow to place an Ancient Jewel there when runewords take up hands, head and chest.
mikelessar wrote: 12 hours agoOk, done. It's in the game now.Rhaegar86 wrote: 12 hours agoFantastic idea. Make it happen lolmikelessar wrote: 12 hours agoI don't think so.
But one socket slot in belts would make sense (the Belt "buckle") and would allow to place an Ancient Jewel there when runewords take up hands, head and chest.
I think a unique Belt with one socket would be cool as an endgame alternative to Arachnid Mesh, but i kinda like that you're forced to use rares/uniques for ur Boots/gloves/ Belt ^^
Another idea: let us socket rings and amulets. 1 socket obviously. Maybe only with Gems, both for balance and aesthetics (Jewels are already in a setting, and runes seem not to fit the jewelry).mikelessar wrote: 12 hours agoI don't think so.
But one socket in belts would make sense (the Belt "buckle") and would allow to place an Ancient Jewel there when runewords take up hands, head and chest. I'm against power-creep but this would only be a minor buff for all characters that might be fun.
One socket for belts is a great idea
A socket in a ring makes little sense to me, as it already has a socket filled with a gem! Amulet could make sense, as could Belt. I wouldn't want to see more than 1 socket though.
All trades are negotiable within reason 
Check out my "Free Stuff" tab for...FREE STUFF!
I can help with DClone/Ubers/Ancients/Socket Rushes, just ask!
Please only add me on bnet if you contact me here first.
Check out my "Free Stuff" tab for...FREE STUFF!
I can help with DClone/Ubers/Ancients/Socket Rushes, just ask!
Please only add me on bnet if you contact me here first.
I think I will like runeword small charm.
Some Trade is available for both rotw and LoD, Most rune , Perfect Gems is only in LoD side.
I will busy at us Stock market open time. 9:30 a.m. ET
I will busy at us Stock market open time. 9:30 a.m. ET
But for crafted belts only, LOL.mikelessar wrote: 12 hours agoI don't think so.
But one socket in belts would make sense (the Belt "buckle") and would allow to place an Ancient Jewel there when runewords take up hands, head and chest. I'm against power-creep but this would only be a minor buff for all characters that might be fun.
As a kid I was picking up all ethereal Boots, gloves, and belts until a friend asked me "have you ever seen one of those with sockets?!" 
Playing HC SSF right now.
Hell completed: Sorc, Druid, Paladin, Ama, Assa
Nightmare completed: Barb
Normal completed: Necro
Iron Man (Paladin): Nightmare A1
Hell completed: Sorc, Druid, Paladin, Ama, Assa
Nightmare completed: Barb
Normal completed: Necro
Iron Man (Paladin): Nightmare A1
I am not sure this would help build diversity, having to decide runeword vs. unique on torso for example would be no decision anymore if you get an extra rbf/uberjewel socket on Belt or ring
Similar pages
-
-
-
-
Profane words error
by » » in Forums
-
-
-
Advertisment
Hide ads
Greetings stranger!
You don't appear to be logged in...
99
Who is online
Users browsing Forums: 
AndreABG, 
BattlePigMac, 
eum26, 
ironable, 
NaglFarfar, 
paw, 
Tbot [Bot], 
Trang Oul, Yandex [Bot] and 511 guests.
No matches
Rhaegar86
43