I understand this was a month ago, but I wanted to mention that the default legacy graphics settings are kinda whack in D2R in regards to the contrast (cranked all the way to max by default) and the selected emulation mode (Glide/Resurrected). After changing the contrast to the halfway point and the emulation to GDI (which I admit is probably a preference thing, I always preferred the pixelated look of DDraw rather than the smoothing/antialiasing of Glide or other renderers) I do think it looks significantly better. Not as good as actual LoD still but way better than the default settings.Snakecharmed wrote: 8 months agoArchive.org is such a valuable resource for so many research and archival projects. I'm glad they're providing access to ISOs of ancient software. There's nothing questionable legally with that because the license to use the software is what you pay for in the form of CD keys, not the physical media or files.
Your screenshot of the old game looks so much better than the legacy graphics in D2R. In comparison, the legacy graphics are oversaturated and smeared like a watercolor because they said to hell with upscaling. This is why I've never been able to play D2R with the legacy graphics beyond trying it out in the act towns. It looks like a blurry mess and the motion is awful.
Screenshot416.jpg
Description
Description byCan be used to make Runewords:
Advertisment
Hide ads
Greetings stranger!
You don't appear to be logged in...Who is online
Users browsing Forums:
Bismillah,
Budodreamer,
CalysD2,
d2Stimpi,
Danzorz,
dejavue,
EpicEricXp,
ganseng,
Google Feedfetcher,
illdizposed,
krathkor,
Muspilli,
Proximic [Bot],
Pvpz,
Rayawo,
roundabout,
sewcioj,
Skaijuice,
SpiritualG,
Yandex [Bot] and 455 guests.
DarkMaster
226