Infinite Gambling Shopping List

Schnorki wrote:

*Glacial

Diadem of Negation - +3 to Cold Skills, Magic Damage Reduced by 6 - Schnorki

Schnorki, I found +3 cold skills MDR by 5. If you want it is yours

SuiciSpai wrote: 1 year ago

Schnorki wrote:

*Glacial

Diadem of Negation - +3 to Cold Skills, Magic Damage Reduced by 6 - Schnorki

Schnorki, I found +3 cold skills MDR by 5. If you want it is yours

Is yours ladder or non-ladder? I found one with MDR 6 on non-ladder, but I suspect Schnorki is searching on ladder.

L vs. NL actually doesn't matter to me. Though I do need a

Diadem, not just any

Circlet and +6 to max out the immortal-effect and make it worth it. :/

Thank you both though.

Schnorki wrote: 1 year ago

L vs. NL actually doesn't matter to me. Though I do need a

Diadem, not just any

Circlet and +6 to max out the immortal-effect and make it worth it. :/

Thank you both though.

Ahhhh, so close!!!!!

Oh well.

Schnorki wrote: 1 year ago

L vs. NL actually doesn't matter to me. Though I do need a

Diadem, not just any

Circlet and +6 to max out the immortal-effect and make it worth it. :/

Thank you both though.

Mine is a

Diadem, but is only 5 though :p

Schnorki wrote: 1 year ago

Bisu wrote: 1 year ago

Snakecharmed wrote: 1 year ago

Meanwhile, I now have my third

Kira's Guardian over the two gambling buff days.

If you stay in the same game, the next unique

Circlet should be

Griffon's Eye

Wouldn't quite work like that here.
Kira's is a

Tiara.
Griffon's is a

Diadem.

So if it upgrade-rolls to

Tiara and rolls unique, it'll be Kira's.
And if it upgrade-rolls to

Diadem and rolls unique, it'll be Griffon's.

Having already received a Kira's in the same game doesn't "force a

Diadem" on the next unique

Tiara roll, it would just give you a failed

Tiara.

So... If you stay in the same game, the next unique

Circlet (that you see) should be

Griffon's Eye

Got a +3 cold, +87 life...looks cool but is it worth it to keep? Will look out for the listed circs as my finger starts to bleed from clicking

OG's will know this.

Bisu wrote: 1 year ago

Schnorki wrote: 1 year ago

Bisu wrote: 1 year ago

If you stay in the same game, the next unique

Circlet should be

Griffon's Eye

Wouldn't quite work like that here.
Kira's is a

Tiara.
Griffon's is a

Diadem.

So if it upgrade-rolls to

Tiara and rolls unique, it'll be Kira's.
And if it upgrade-rolls to

Diadem and rolls unique, it'll be Griffon's.

Having already received a Kira's in the same game doesn't "force a

Diadem" on the next unique

Tiara roll, it would just give you a failed

Tiara.

So... If you stay in the same game, the next unique

Circlet (that you see) should be

Griffon's Eye

Ok, in the sense that "you simply won't be able to roll any others anymore", yes, I suppose so.

I took your statement as the otherwise usually discussed in such context "improve your odds because you've eliminated the other option", which wouldn't be the case here.

Hello guys, i also need a rather unique item, a magic amulet, +3 cold skills 35 magic find(must be 35 magic find), a perfect one

R3venant wrote: 1 year ago

Hello guys, i also need a rather unique item, a magic amulet, +3 cold skills 35 magic find(must be 35 magic find), a perfect one

Too late, the special already passed

Skaijuice wrote: 1 year ago

darn it...the search continues.

image.png

This is worth around 15

Ber with 2sox mate 25dr is worth ~40-70, better then CoA for max dr setup and you can switch hoto for White, since u wont use verdungo with that

Circlet.

Well, since Infinite Gambling is back, I'm going to bump the topic and update it for R3venant

Though, after this discussion, I have realized that some of the requested items are worth a fair bit more than I originally imagined. I guess take that into consideration before making a trade based on this thread.

I still intend to give away things I find, but that's my intentional misuse of resources, not a suggestion.

Yeah. They totally had twenty days or whatever of this planned. ^_~

I have not been able to connect a single minute today. My list is still up to date, so maybe someone will be my angel today... life with a new born is tough sometimes !

Good night and get lucky, people !

Hmmmmm.... almost found one of my own items on the shopping list. It's a

Diadem, which is cool, I wasn't going to be particular, but the damage reduction roll...is it good enough? Hmmmmmmmmm

Everlasting goes up to 25. I'll keep if it rolls 24..but 13 isn't worth keeping..

Skaijuice wrote: 1 year ago

Everlasting goes up to 25. I'll keep if it rolls 24..but 13 isn't worth keeping..

And I put 20+ on the list, but with this being the closest I've gotten after 3 days of this gambling buff, my standards are definitely falling to the "well...would it work?" point. We'll see what manages to turn up before this ends I suppose before I waste a

Larzuk on it. I am quite disappointed that I haven't found anyone else's items either. I thought with a decent list of things to watch for I'd at least be able to give away 1.

I hear you.

I've spent nearly 40m on gambling rings since you posted this thread, and I've yet to see any dual leach ring let alone one Necrarch would want.

Oh, well.

For javazon, just put 1 jewel with 3 maek. Mana would not be an issue.
Bowazon should be good with mana leech.