"Perfect" Item Ads

offload wrote: 6 days ago

easiest solution is just to be happy that the site exists at all, and move on with life.

I could not possibly agree more with you. I used to get wound up real tight in these conversations. Then I realized "why the fuck do I care so much? My life must be really boring if I let conversations like this get me all bent out of shape". So I started giving my fucks towards things that actually matter and I'm much happier for it.

NxZsolt wrote: 6 days ago

Should be a new category "Near Perfect" and the problem solved. So they can pop out from the average and they wont lie if they mark with that.

But then we need to define what is this "Near Perfect" category? 80+%? 85+%? 90+% 95+%?
Without it the same problem arises.

It's great as is. Perfect generally means perfect on the most important roll that defines 95% of the value. This is how it's used in-game as well. There is no need to change this.

Calling it "Near Perfect" even with a definition would

Confuse people.

Now, the site creator COULD add a tag called "Collector Perfect" to indicate perfect on all rolls, but why?

1) It will take up their time

2) It will impact maybe a handful of trades annually at most on the site

3) It may

Confuse people as to what tag to pick. People need simple options.

This is trying to solve for a scenario that is much too niche for this site.

i dont get it...
trade/ormus-robes-t1830421.html

IIFOXII wrote: 13 hours ago

i dont get it...
trade/ormus-robes-t1830421.html
grafik.png

its perfect on fire

To call this perfect with +3 to ColdNova and 11% to the corresponding cold element is farcical, even by the lax interpretation of the word "perfect" that the forum rules allow here.

And a perfect example why I would contradict varangium when he claims that "It's great as is"...

wulfen777 wrote: 12 hours ago

To call this perfect with +3 to ColdNova and 11% to the corresponding cold element is farcical, even by the lax interpretation of the word "perfect" that the forum rules allow here.

And a perfect example why I would contradict varangium when he claims that "It's great as is"...

Haha yes, there will always be people that push or misunderstand the rules. By "it's great as is", I mean the way most players interpret it works pretty well. That will always be the case, no matter what the rule.

But at least we get some humor out of it when we waste the click.

I think I saw a "Perfect"

Latent Cold Rupture that was listed earlier, that had -73% cold res, which is doubly funny since on a Latent the cold res doesn't even matter. I don't see it anymore, perhaps they took it down out of embarrassment

varangium wrote: 12 hours ago

wulfen777 wrote: 12 hours ago

To call this perfect with +3 to ColdNova and 11% to the corresponding cold element is farcical, even by the lax interpretation of the word "perfect" that the forum rules allow here.

And a perfect example why I would contradict varangium when he claims that "It's great as is"...

Haha yes, there will always be people that push or misunderstand the rules. By "it's great as is", I mean the way most players interpret it works pretty well. That will always be the case, no matter what the rule.

But at least we get some humor out of it when we waste the click.

I think I saw a "Perfect"

Latent Cold Rupture that was listed earlier, that had -73% cold res, which is doubly funny since on a Latent the cold res doesn't even matter. I don't see it anymore, perhaps they took it down out of embarrassment

Sunders are difficult to understand for newer players. I saw a game a few months ago advertising a perfect sunder (pre ROTW) with the max of 90%. The host even explained it as much..

We can remove abusive perfects - did it for the

Ormus.

Necrarch wrote: 4 hours ago

We can remove abusive perfects - did it for the

Ormus.

Thank you, Necrarch