Jesus... Anyone who spends that much on mobile games has a lack of control over his spending, and likely needs a therapy.
The mobile game monthly 50-100 per month, even for teenager, that is very common. In asia, pay player, It is average case for people want to play it quick without spend too much time. And I feel you are right in some way so I quit spend that way.
Top tier of that game is usually , in my guess, top 10% spender , 300 . (exclude 1-10)
JP today is around 5000 Y gift card(around 60-80) , TW / Kor is around 70-140 for age 18-25. Teenager is kind of bad. I see 'some' in rank 5-10 spender.
I know that people read post here generally consider older. The thing is today's development, is focus on use development force on who pays more with less cost.(90s is winner take all, it's more friendly env today for developer. But certainly we cant see good work but ok game today)
If we dont focus that much on pay play today.
Let's switch focus to other that I lately watch, some manipulate that I feel, Cham, Jah rune, I notice some manipulate price weeks ago. I see some of my TW friend get around 20% profit in those trade. Much earlier story before I notice, is Zod, Cham before some patch. Some big player here, they really need very big storage for things have high value. They tell me, they buy thing on 140 storage base / per unit.
Yeah you can have as many charms as in vanilla D2 AND a whole inventory left for hoarding. That beats the purpose of having to balance charms/space of the existing system. You can call it QoL, I call it excessive and making the game even easier than it already is by having even less to think about. It's like we're moving even more to an "auto-pilot" system rather than actually having any input and different decisions for different play styles.
There is no balance in "inventory tetris". It's only an annoyance since the introduction of charms. Players have already chosen. Just look at anyrandomMaxrollguide. If you have to choose between power and convenience, you always choose power. That's how games work. And how am I supposed to play a farming game, if I am not able to pick up any item? Have the inventory opened (=half of the screen covered), click on the item, put it in the cube and only then identify it - one item at a time? It's already inconvenient in SP, and good luck doing it in a Baalrun, where everyone plays a melee build.
And I'm not even mentioning PvP, where you need to be minmaxed to the extreme, so even the cube and TP tome needs to go. This is a flawed system, which should be fixed.
Yeah you can have as many charms as in vanilla D2 AND a whole inventory left for hoarding. That beats the purpose of having to balance charms/space of the existing system. You can call it QoL, I call it excessive and making the game even easier than it already is by having even less to think about. It's like we're moving even more to an "auto-pilot" system rather than actually having any input and different decisions for different play styles.
There is no balance in "inventory tetris". It's only an annoyance since the introduction of charms. Players have already chosen. Just look at anyrandomMaxrollguide. If you have to choose between power and convenience, you always choose power. That's how games work. And how am I supposed to play a farming game, if I am not able to pick up any item? Have the inventory opened (=half of the screen covered), click on the item, put it in the cube and only then identify it - one item at a time? It's already inconvenient in SP, and good luck doing it in a Baalrun, where everyone plays a melee build.
And I'm not even mentioning PvP, where you need to be minmaxed to the extreme, so even the cube and TP tome needs to go. This is a flawed system, which should be fixed.
We agree to disagree! Still seems extremely excessive to have an extra inventory, it is what it is.
And personally I don't choose power, nor do I have to pick up every single item in the game. I put the interesting ones in the cube, leave 8 slots in the inventory for other stuff too, finish a few areas and go back to identify, unless I find a scroll. There is absolutely no reason to keep picking and picking. If you're a hoarder, that's a "you" issue.
Edit: the "you" doesn't go directly to you, but to the hoarding thing in general
GMT +2 / GMT +3 on DST (Greece)
Please add me on B.Net ONLY if you match my BiN, or we came to an agreement.
Do not send me offers on B.Net PMs
And personally I don't choose power, nor do I have to pick up every single item in the game. I put the interesting ones in the cube, leave 8 slots in the inventory for other stuff too, finish a few areas and go back to identify, unless I find a scroll. There is absolutely no reason to keep picking and picking. If you're a hoarder, that's a "you" issue.
I'm glad that you are not one of the mixmaxers (and I am not too; I also leave 4×2 slots for at least one item).
But the majority of players are. And because "given the opportunity, players will optimize the fun out of a game", "one of the responsibilities of the designer is to protect players from themselves".
That's why I wish the devs protected us and gave us a proper charm inventory . Or, if that 1/2/3 extra skillers are an issue, dedicated slots for unique charms and, say, 4×5 space for magic charms.
And personally I don't choose power, nor do I have to pick up every single item in the game. I put the interesting ones in the cube, leave 8 slots in the inventory for other stuff too, finish a few areas and go back to identify, unless I find a scroll. There is absolutely no reason to keep picking and picking. If you're a hoarder, that's a "you" issue.
I'm glad that you are not one of the mixmaxers (and I am not too; I also leave 4×2 slots for at least one item).
But the majority of players are. And because "given the opportunity, players will optimize the fun out of a game", "one of the responsibilities of the designer is to protect players from themselves".
That's why I wish the devs protected us and gave us a proper charm inventory . Or, if that 1/2/3 extra skillers are an issue, dedicated slots for unique charms and, say, 4×5 space for magic charms.
I totally agree with that quote, that's why I made the "autopilot" comment before. Most games are anyway like that, click here, wait, as less brain input as possible.
And although I wouldn't be a fan of a dedicated charm inventory, one just for the uniques sounds better.
GMT +2 / GMT +3 on DST (Greece)
Please add me on B.Net ONLY if you match my BiN, or we came to an agreement.
Do not send me offers on B.Net PMs
BTW (not sure if anyone has mentioned it already, couldn't see it when browsing this thread): The empty space for potential new tabs only shows in modern graphics at this point, not in classic graphics mode.
BTW (not sure if anyone has mentioned it already, couldn't see it when browsing this thread): The empty space for potential new tabs only shows in modern graphics at this point, not in classic graphics mode.
BTW (not sure if anyone has mentioned it already, couldn't see it when browsing this thread): The empty space for potential new tabs only shows in modern graphics at this point, not in classic graphics mode.
And it only shows in mouse mode.
The controller UI looks the same as always.
ElSolDolLol
For low items I also accept: Perfect Amys, Ral, Hel, Tokens, Keys. Please don't offer runes lower than Pul (with the named exceptions).
NO PM OFFERS PLEASE! BE FAIR AND WRITE INTO THE THREAD
BTW (not sure if anyone has mentioned it already, couldn't see it when browsing this thread): The empty space for potential new tabs only shows in modern graphics at this point, not in classic graphics mode.
And it only shows in mouse mode.
The controller UI looks the same as always.
lol! I should get the old trackball mouse out to see if it's a """"""L-A-S-E-R"""""" related thing!
If we know anything about Blizzard we can expect:
"NOW, exclusively, only for $99.99 you can buy one-time +2 tabs addition for your characters to enjoy having even more stuff" followed by shutting down servers for good in ~6 months. xd
I'd actually prefer an option to buy extra stash over having to use mules. Mules are stupid. You basically get 25 mules for 40$ or for 14$ at a discount. A mule has 140 stash spaces.
So it would translate to 1$ per shared stash which I'd consider a fair price.
Making d2r free to play and monetizing via shared stash space would be good for players and for blizzard. It's so intuitive I'm surprised Blizzard is not doing it.
I, as someone who already has 4 accounts (well 3 of my own and my father's on which he's using only 5 slots) would for sure buy more tabs or more character slots if they were available, but only for a reasonable price. So I'm not opposing you or saying that you are wrong, I just cracked a joke but also kinda said what we're all thinking.
Big however, mules could still be used for a proper runs/grind/experiments or whatever you need while additional stash tabs are just there for convenience reasons.
P.S. I bought all of my other accounts via discounts, only the main one was bought during full price (it was literally day 1 of D2R IIRC).
How do you purchase/use additional accounts? For me the Blizzard page just says i already have the game.
List trades and earn trust
Level up as you post
Give and Receive Likes
Discreet Notifications
Avatar & Profile customisation
Private Messaging
Bookmark Pages & Posts
Use Drafts & Revisions
Attach Images
Squelches this trader, making their offers on your trades invisible to anyone except themselves. Their trade listings will also be hidden from your marketplace.
Your squelch list can be managed and edited from Top right dropdown > Account Prefs > Squelches.
Hide ads
AdsBot [Google], 
Lun2010, 
TimeSlayer and 64 guests.
Morder07
76