Uber Diablo occurrence record keeping (Softcore Non-Ladder)

ShadowHeart wrote: 1 year ago

Someone put it up at 5/6 again temporarily, but it's still at 4/6...

Who are these trolls? Does @Teebling have a history of these false reports, perhaps?

If you see someone trolling, tell me their username and I can take a look.

Teebling wrote: 1 year ago

ShadowHeart wrote: 1 year ago

Someone put it up at 5/6 again temporarily, but it's still at 4/6...

Who are these trolls? Does @Teebling have a history of these false reports, perhaps?

If you see someone trolling, tell me their username and I can take a look.

Wasn't around to spot the username but someone set asia SC NL to 5/6 at least 4 times throughout the afternoon/evening today, all of which were blatant trolling/misinformation (it was and still is at 4/6). Your logs probably have the username to go with that.

(For rough timestamps..in CEST)

Schnorki wrote: 1 year ago

Teebling wrote: 1 year ago

ShadowHeart wrote: 1 year ago

Someone put it up at 5/6 again temporarily, but it's still at 4/6...

Who are these trolls? Does @Teebling have a history of these false reports, perhaps?

If you see someone trolling, tell me their username and I can take a look.

Wasn't around to spot the username but someone set asia SC NL to 5/6 at least 4 times throughout the afternoon/evening today, all of which were blatant trolling/misinformation (it was and still is at 4/6). Your logs probably have the username to go with that.


image.png
(For rough timestamps..in CEST)

I squelched one of those boys from earlier today. Don't know if that does anything for the trolling though on the tracker.

Satire wrote: 1 year ago

I squelched one of those boys from earlier today. Don't know if that does anything for the trolling though on the tracker.

Can't there be a system where a certain number of status change "votes" would be needed to get the status changed? Or only users who have been on the forum for a certain amount of time or have a certain level of reputation be allowed to submit status changes?

h4ldol wrote: 1 year ago

Satire wrote: 1 year ago

I squelched one of those boys from earlier today. Don't know if that does anything for the trolling though on the tracker.

Can't there be a system where a certain number of status change "votes" would be needed to get the status changed? Or only users who have been on the forum for a certain amount of time or have a certain level of reputation be allowed to submit status changes?

It works quite well as is. The occasional troll may slip through but..mweh.

A number of the alert solutions available handle that by adding some sort of confirmation mechanic.
But the drawback is if you wait for confirmation or a 'vote', you lose time. And if you're looking at something like a non-ladder private walk, that's time you may well not have. Even more so because those have recently happened at distinct off-times, meaning the number of folks available in that region was bound to be on the very low end. So waiting for confirmation or votes in a situation like that would likely not give you any status change/indication until after the walk is long over and you're voting it back to 1.

Yes, trolls slip through as is. But they are by now thankfully comparatively rare, not counting those annoying instances of the /uberdiablo command bugging out for half the folks out there again. That though, even with a voting system, would result in the same odd "tug of war" between them so no real gain.
And the trolls that do get through are for the most part being handled. The name availability helps quite a bit with that so they can be reported and taken care of.
Still beats consistently missing walks (especially NL) because you're waiting for votes that won't come in in time.
The confirmation that I built into my own solution is probably as "time efficient" as it gets for any such indirect solution and even with that, some of the NL walk changes slipped through without alerting under stricter settings because they just go too fast to confirm.

Though yeah, limiting the ability to submit a status by having some minimum level of trust (5-10 being perfectly sufficient) and/or a minimum account age would probably be a helpful addition. Just to immediately sort out the obvious trolls who make a new account solely to mess with the tracker.

Good morning! So it is still 4/6 in As NL?

Yup, still 4/6 as far as I can tell.

Same now. Loooong spawn this time (hopefully my connection will stay on...)

Anyone had luck farming some SoJ to increase the count? Did 10 runs on

Andariel, I received enough "

Scroll of Town Portal" to come and say hi again.

LordNoob wrote: 1 year ago

Anyone had luck farming some SoJ to increase the count? Did 10 runs on

Andariel, I received enough "

Scroll of Town Portal" to come and say hi again.

Farm NM Andy instead of Hell.
NM Andy can only drop 3 types of unique ring, SOJ, Manald and Nagel.
10 runs is nothing, at least hundreds of run.
Wrong chat to ask though.

The last time i did nm andy runs i need one week 2-3 hours a day to get one soj

I'm getting "Gazes" on Asia, is it a bug on my end, or did the walk happen?

its happened

DClone did spawn! Checked my game and the chat log included both the 5/6 message and the invasion message.

Oh god I hope my game at home didn‘t crash!!!!

Asia NL popped, I got: 17/15/5 & 18/14/8, not too shabby

Waiting was worth it - got 19/20/10 yaay

Skullbriar wrote: 1 year ago

Waiting was worth it - got 19/20/10 yaay

Gratz, almost perfect!

17-14-6 not great not terrible

FInally got my first DClone for more than a month. Hard battle, way harder than the previous ones (does it have random immunities?), had to

Revive mer twice, give him tons of full rejuv... and all that for a 11/14/5 !

But still happy to have had a good fight.