it will be okay. They just create a new time-line.Trang Oul wrote: 3 hours agoIt will. But did the devs have a choice? They wanted to sell Reign of the Warlock, not to give it for free (and that's reasonable; I'm not not arguing about it).Phoenix_00 wrote: 21 hours ago1. Will this not fracture the community further? We already have 9 groups: Pre-Expansion Soft Core/Hard Core with Ladder/Non-Ladder, Expansion Soft Core/Hard Core with Ladder/Non-Ladder, and Offline (obviously variations within offline, but its all solo play at that point anyway). At least I think that is all the permutations.
So what were the other options?
Paywall only the Warlock? No, the expansion is much more than just the new class.
Paywall everything (so, for example, a character without RotW couldn't pick up new items)? That'd be even worse, especially in a multiplayer game with economy.
So a new game more ("era") was the least worst option...
At least the current timeline in this d2r will be finalize. It will be classic without worry something bad going to happen. We will have a golden version stay right now.
The unable to pick up story is exactly d3 necro dlc did.
I am not sure what will they do in future if most player base stay in d2r and they want to release another dlc warlock v2 with wow style world. act6-10.
Or even worse, 50% here 50% there. if they continue to do max profit style, DLC both d2r and warlock, make it 4 different world...
leox
291